sqbr: She's getting existential again. It's ok I have a super soaker. (existentialism)
Sophie ([personal profile] sqbr) wrote 2010-02-08 06:53 am (UTC)

I definitely think 4 and 5 should not be criticised or externally judged. I think they might want to ask themselves why they aren't engaging with the topic, but they may have a very good answer to that question, and nobody but them knows what's going on in their heads. And they should not be included in link roundups on the topic!

I think Poster 8 would be blameless were they not immediately following, and aware of, Poster 6. If there was no Poster 6, there would be nothing connecting disability in fanfic to the silencing of women's voices, and the two topics could coexist happily.

And I can definitely see the argument for Poster 8 being justified anyway, it does depend on the exact circumstances and how much responsibility you think people should take for the indirect effects of their actions. The only unambiguous derailer here is Poster 6.

Post a comment in response:

From:
Anonymous (will be screened)
OpenID (will be screened if not on Access List)
Identity URL: 
User (will be screened if not on Access List)
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org


 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.