sqbr: She's getting existential again. It's ok I have a super soaker. (existentialism)
Sophie ([personal profile] sqbr) wrote 2010-02-10 03:45 am (UTC)

Oh yes, it's a lot easier to judge in those situations, which is why I don't need to make a long rambly post trying to figure out out :)

I guess for me, the litmus test is always whether someone is turning a discussion of a systemic problem, like discrimination, into a discussion of something personal and individual. That negates the analysis that what a person is experiencing is part of something larger and social.

I think what you're talking about is a subset of what I meant by "avoidance" rather than what most people mean by derailing. Poster 6 is talking about sexism, which is in and of itself just as important and systemic as ableism, yet is a classic derailer imo. And whatever they are saying Poster 4 in a locked post is not derailing the conversation because they are not fully a part of it.

Post a comment in response:

From:
Anonymous (will be screened)
OpenID (will be screened if not on Access List)
Identity URL: 
User (will be screened if not on Access List)
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org


 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.