When this first arrived from the library I thought "Wait, Newberry Award Honor Book? Am I reading young adult fantasy? Crap.". But then it quickly grew on me. It flowed very nicely and I liked the characters and story (no female characters, but that made sense in context), and the Greece inspired worldbuilding was understated but effective. It felt like a real country, I can't think of any other fantasy I've read with a convincing Mediterranean climate(*). Also the protagonist Gen is quite dark and no big deal is made about it. But apart from the fact that I liked Gen more when I thought he was a teenager rather than an immature twenty something (EDIT: oh, ok, he is a teenager), there was one thing that I predicted early on and knew would retrospectively really annoy me if it happened, and it did.
SPOILERS!!
I was really taken with how three dimensional and relatable Gen was, rather than being some irritating cliche of a lower class character. And then I realised that he was probably going to turn out to be a king or something. And lo, he was the cousin of a Queen. And then he complained about how HORRIBLE it was being forced to act like an icky poor person :( This also explains the avoidance of lots of long boring exposition about his family and life etc, which I had thought was just nice subtle writing. I also didn't like that the student who was a poor second son was driven to betray them all through jealousy, unlike the kind sweet heir to the throne. It's making me feel very unenthusiastic about reading the other books in the series.
The previous pseudo period fantasy novel I read did a similar thing. I have some vague nebulous thought about British writers remembering that lower class people exist but presenting the good ones as fairly happy with their lot, while writers from the US are more likely to have a subconscious bias that anyone in the story worth paying attention to will have been upper class all along. I think the relative Australian-ness of the setting of "The Thief" didn't help with me feeling like the story had betrayed me, since here we have a long history of seeing thieves as heroes and kings as annoying oppressors to be thwarted and mocked. Maybe I should try reading more Australian fantasy, see if it pisses me off less. (Probably not. It's not like Australians aren't horribly classist too)
Also, this isn't about classism or whatever, but I think I was supposed to start liking the Magus at some point, and I didn't. It felt like she started with some morally complex characters with interesting relationships and smoothed it all out to everyone left alive at the end being good decent people who wanted the best for their countries and were all super close friends (On the plus side I guess that does make the Magus a sort of sympathetic lower class character). All in all it didn't end up being the book I thought it was at the beginning.
(*)Though this did mean that I kept imagining the mountains they crossed as the Darling Ranges
SPOILERS!!
I was really taken with how three dimensional and relatable Gen was, rather than being some irritating cliche of a lower class character. And then I realised that he was probably going to turn out to be a king or something. And lo, he was the cousin of a Queen. And then he complained about how HORRIBLE it was being forced to act like an icky poor person :( This also explains the avoidance of lots of long boring exposition about his family and life etc, which I had thought was just nice subtle writing. I also didn't like that the student who was a poor second son was driven to betray them all through jealousy, unlike the kind sweet heir to the throne. It's making me feel very unenthusiastic about reading the other books in the series.
The previous pseudo period fantasy novel I read did a similar thing. I have some vague nebulous thought about British writers remembering that lower class people exist but presenting the good ones as fairly happy with their lot, while writers from the US are more likely to have a subconscious bias that anyone in the story worth paying attention to will have been upper class all along. I think the relative Australian-ness of the setting of "The Thief" didn't help with me feeling like the story had betrayed me, since here we have a long history of seeing thieves as heroes and kings as annoying oppressors to be thwarted and mocked. Maybe I should try reading more Australian fantasy, see if it pisses me off less. (Probably not. It's not like Australians aren't horribly classist too)
Also, this isn't about classism or whatever, but I think I was supposed to start liking the Magus at some point, and I didn't. It felt like she started with some morally complex characters with interesting relationships and smoothed it all out to everyone left alive at the end being good decent people who wanted the best for their countries and were all super close friends (On the plus side I guess that does make the Magus a sort of sympathetic lower class character). All in all it didn't end up being the book I thought it was at the beginning.
(*)Though this did mean that I kept imagining the mountains they crossed as the Darling Ranges
no subject
And leaving everyone alive at the end... is probably the only nice thing she's ever done to her characters (and there are points where they would disagree and say killing them would have been nicer). Okay, I can't really remember anything too terrible happening to the Magus, but I think he's the exception. You don't really start to like him until the next book, iirc.
The female characters show up a lot more in the sequels, too, as does the moral complexity. Everyone still wants the best for their countries (basically), but as they're from different countries, those desires don't line up and all sorts of spoilery Bad Things happen.
no subject
Haha, ok, once I get over the Gen-in-my-head not having ever existed I will have to give the rest a go, though I can see me complaining that it's all too dark and looking like a hypocrite :)
It definitely felt like there just happened not to be any female characters rather than Turner not wanting to write them, I was about 3/4 of the way through the book before I even noticed and I liked the glimpses we saw at the end.
no subject
As for dark, Queen of Attolia gets pretty dark pretty quickly, but I think that bit is the the most outright "gaaaaahhhh I can't believe she just... how can she get away with that?!?!?!?!" part of the series. And then Gen whines some more, but that's not really a spoiler because Gen whining is sorta his default response to everything on some level.
no subject
Give Queen of Attolia a go, if you get the chance. It's a really wonderful book, with several extremely awesome ladies.
no subject
no subject
The class thing never quite balances out, although the narrator of the third book is more middle-class, as I recall. The female characters, on the other hand, take greater prominence from the second book onwards.
no subject
I was fairly sure I could expect at least one more female character in "The Queen of Attolia", but it's good to know there's more :)