Very nice, I absolutely agree. I think the teapot argument is fine as description of ones own point of view (including a teapot-less model of the universe), but not for convincing others to agree. It's equivalent to apologetics from the religious side like Pascall's wager or the "What are the chances that the universe just happens to allow life?" argument.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: This is just because "probably no God" arguments bug me a bit...