ext_54531 ([identity profile] warpwind.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] sqbr 2009-02-18 05:05 am (UTC)

Oh yes, let's ignore the other 8 or so methods of radioisotope dating and focus on the one (C-14) or two (He) that give us the dates that we want. Even then the dates they give are about 6000 years old give or take and only on certain specimens. They are treating outlier results as gospel and ignoring the rest of the data available!

argh need to stop ranting and start working on work stuff
(58 comments)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.