March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, June 4th, 2009 02:28 am (UTC)
Yes and no. If a situation is more difficult/exclusionary for disabled people than it has to be, then it is ableist, and if something is ableist then it immediately becomes the "cause" of disabled people. POC (and white people!) don't get to be ableist (or sexist or whatever) while fighting racism, the same way that feminists and disability advocates aren't allowed to be racist (and this is something large sections of the feminist movement still have trouble with, interpreting any criticism as "an attack from the Patriarchy").

Of course I also don't get to be racist while criticising POC for being ableist. Navigating these competing priorities is difficult, but the best way to get a less one-sided POV is to talk/listen to people in both boats, in this case disabled POC.

This still ends up back to what you said: asking POC and other anti-racists. Which I did, I posted to [community profile] debunkingwhite and got some very helpful and understanding responses. Specifically, some people volunteered to be available if I have to say "I can't deal with comments to this, but someone needs to".

Reply

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org