sami: (Default)
Sami ([personal profile] sami) wrote in [personal profile] sqbr 2009-08-06 10:27 am (UTC)

I haven't read Chiang's, but I'd argue it's very difficult for the science to be mindblowing. It's either too much within reach or too far outside it. Or requires a novel to explicate.

Ringworld (Niven) is pretty awesome, conceptually. Greg Egan's one about the Theory of Everything is brilliant too. The rest? Meh.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org