hebethen: (Default)
Hebe ([personal profile] hebethen) wrote in [personal profile] sqbr 2013-07-11 01:37 pm (UTC)

I... haven't personally seen female-character stans whose pointed criticisms were motivated by smugness and exceptionalism rather than frustration or bitterness over the lack of fannish love for [female character(s)]. Although, like nerdiness, I'm positive that some must have channeled their frustration into smugness as a coping mechanism, and again similarly, it's a harmful one.

I do agree that it's probably more, mmm... the word isn't "practical" or "relevant" but rather a sort of intersection or filtering of the two, if that makes any sense... to emphasize the effects of actions and trends that perpetuate a sexist environment. In this matter, the two parties you list are not equatable.

I am leery, though, of statements like "telling them to stop their natural fannish self expression itself perpetuates sexism". There are so many ways in which a fan's "natural fannish self expression" could actually be totally 1) assholeish or 2) oppressive, even if she is a woman; I am not of the opinion that a (nonfictional) woman choosing to do whatever she wants is inherently antisexist. (It is of course a different story when one considers the different responses to her [action] and men's [similar action], but in at least this particular case, I am skeptical that men are being held to a lower standard.)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org