I've always been a little dubious about sexual harassment complaints, without knowing more about both sides of the situation.
Sexual Harassment is like art, IMO.
How much of it is art because the creator said it was art / created it to be art, and how much of it is art because the viewer sees it as art/artistic? Does one person thinking it is art make it more, or less as art to an unopinioned person? What about to the creator? What about "found" art, with no creator? Is that truly art? Even if it wasn't art, can it become art? Now for the big one: does it matter if it is?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Sexual Harassment is like art, IMO.
How much of it is art because the creator said it was art / created it to be art, and how much of it is art because the viewer sees it as art/artistic? Does one person thinking it is art make it more, or less as art to an unopinioned person? What about to the creator? What about "found" art, with no creator? Is that truly art? Even if it wasn't art, can it become art? Now for the big one: does it matter if it is?
(I do hope my analogy is understood)