<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>Thorns</title>
  <link>https://sqbr.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>Thorns - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:20:28 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>sqbr</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://sqbr.dreamwidth.org/273061.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:20:28 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>A non-spoilery rant about &quot;Kick Ass&quot;</title>
  <link>https://sqbr.dreamwidth.org/273061.html</link>
  <description>So, on the whole, Kick Ass was &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; my sort of film. It&apos;s both a straightforward geek-becomes-superhero wish fulfillment and a subversion of it, and the violence was glorious (I quite like violence done right). I agree with those saying that the violence and swearing really aren&apos;t worth complaining about, and aren&apos;t even extra specially celebrated compared to many other films (the violence looks like it &lt;em&gt;hurts&lt;/em&gt;, for good guys and bad). But.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I kept hearing it was good in an over the top puerile sort of way, and was ok with that, but just before watching it found out it was based on a comic by Mark Millar. As it started I was reminded of this, and of &lt;a href=&quot;http://alias-sqbr.livejournal.com/91457.html&quot;&gt;how I felt about Wanted&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;cut-wrapper&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;display: none;&quot; id=&quot;span-cuttag___1&quot; class=&quot;cuttag&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;b class=&quot;cut-open&quot;&gt;(&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b class=&quot;cut-text&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://sqbr.dreamwidth.org/273061.html#cutid1&quot;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b class=&quot;cut-close&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;display: none;&quot; id=&quot;div-cuttag___1&quot; aria-live=&quot;assertive&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=sqbr&amp;ditemid=273061&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://sqbr.dreamwidth.org/273061.html</comments>
  <category>rant</category>
  <category>comics</category>
  <category>review</category>
  <category>movies</category>
  <category>sff</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>8</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://sqbr.dreamwidth.org/244722.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>The true identity of men without hats in xkcd</title>
  <link>https://sqbr.dreamwidth.org/244722.html</link>
  <description>Something I never really thought about until it was pointed out to me but have been noticing more and more is who goes &quot;unmarked&quot; in cartoon depictions. One of the more obvious examples is stick figures: white male characters just get the default stick figure, while female/black etc ones will be marked as such explicitly. One consequence is that characters whose ethnicity/gender is not made explicit (eg most of them) are assumed to be white/male/etc.(*) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;xkcd is not immune from this, the female characters pretty much always have long hair while the default/male ones hair tends not to be drawn at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But see &lt;a href=&quot;http://xkcd.com/617/&quot;&gt;Understocked&lt;/a&gt;. The &quot;marked&quot; quantities are having a beard/glasses and being a police officer, but not being black.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;Awesome&quot; I thought &quot;He hasn&apos;t felt the need to make non-white ethnicity a marked quantity, which in turn means his unmarked characters can be read as POC as easily as they can as white.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And then I thought &quot;Wait, Obama isn&apos;t marked at all. He looks just like the generic protagonist(s). &lt;em&gt;What if all the unmarked characters are Barack Obama&lt;/em&gt;?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So that&apos;s how I&apos;m going to read the comic from now on :D &lt;a href=&quot;http://xkcd.com/285/&quot;&gt;This is definitely him&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(*)This effect confuses westerners about anime/manga, since japanese people see themselves as the default and draw non-japanese people as the funny looking marked other. Unlike western animation, characters with features/colouring etc never seen in real life who don&apos;t fit preconceived stereotypes of foreigners (eg white people have big noses) are always assumed to be japanese.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=sqbr&amp;ditemid=244722&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://sqbr.dreamwidth.org/244722.html</comments>
  <category>race</category>
  <category>thoughts</category>
  <category>comics</category>
  <lj:mood>cheerful</lj:mood>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>13</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
