Thursday, May 29th, 2008 05:58 pm
So in a shocking development noone could have predicted, it turns out that raising the tax on premixed drinks just encouraged people to buy spirits and mix their own.

Ha!

EDIT: Yes, ok, I'm an idiot (see the comments). You know when I said I was too tired, grumpy, and stupid to post? Well, the first two have gotten better...
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 10:20 am (UTC)
Doesn't the same amount of excise get charged either way now?

Thursday, May 29th, 2008 10:28 am (UTC)
Hey, don't ask me, I just predict the news, I don't have to understand it :)
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 10:22 am (UTC)
I am smarter than Alan Carpenter
Not to contest your claim (which is probably valid), but you mean K-Rudd right?
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 10:31 am (UTC)
*blinks*

I could have SWORN it was a state issue.

Which is at least better than thinking Alan Carpenter was Prime minister :)

Still, I'm not sure I am smarter than Kevin Rudd, I mean his mandarin is certainly better than mine. And his name doesn't semi-rhyme. Dammit.
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 10:34 am (UTC)
But have they moved onto HEROIN (http://penchaft.livejournal.com/494508.html)?
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 10:57 am (UTC)
No, because:

me > government > channel 7
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 10:57 am (UTC)
OMG they're doing just what we did before pre-mixed drinks came along!
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 12:16 pm (UTC)
If the choice is between pre-mixed drinks, and mixing your own, and the cost is the same, then I like to think that people will choose the option that tastes better
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 01:55 pm (UTC)
You'd like to think that, yes.
Friday, May 30th, 2008 01:35 am (UTC)
You're forgetting the cost of labour of mixing. It's very tiring on the arms!
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 12:19 pm (UTC)
Not the point, as the excise and total cost on the two are now the same.
The point was that formerly, premixed drinks were in fact cheaper. Don't think of it as adding a tax - think of it as removing an odd discount. And now the discount is removed, while mixing drinks rather than buying premixed will increase relatively, hopefully the combined consumption of the two will decrease.

Not that I care. Alcopops are trashy.
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 12:57 pm (UTC)
Initial reports suggest this is the case, since the introduction of the tax something like 500,000 standard drinks less per week have been purchased.

ABC (http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/05/29/2258723.htm)
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 12:57 pm (UTC)
Hilariously, this is the same article Sophie linked to.
Friday, May 30th, 2008 01:13 am (UTC)
Yeah, yeah, you can't expect me to read everything. Sheesh.

*is an idiot*
Thursday, May 29th, 2008 03:39 pm (UTC)
Were they really cheaper? I know the excise was less, but the overall cost seemed quite expensive.
Friday, May 30th, 2008 01:12 am (UTC)
I was going to say "Yes, but they also said it would cut down on drinking, which it didn't"... but it is somewhat undercut by the fact that it did cut down the total amount of drinking, as stated in the last line, which I somehow missed. So I shall instead shut up :)