May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829 3031

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, August 6th, 2008 02:01 pm
So, one of the standards I try to hold myself to is to be open to criticism and other points of view. Two criticisms I've had people make of me (directly and indirectly) here and there are that
(a)This whole blogging about racism and feminism etc is pointless or otherwise a bad idea
(b)People who disagree with me (or don't feel as strongly) on these or related issues find this lj unwelcoming/intimidating

(EDIT: I'm paraphrasing, and I think I've accidentally created straw-critics who you are all defending me from when the actual things people said really weren't that bad, mostly. My plan for a "nice simple links post instead of a tricky thinky real post about race" seem to have been less than successful...)

Now I'm still feeling a bit too dumb to write a proper post on either issue, but looking through [livejournal.com profile] ibarw I came accross three posts which go into the first question really well:



And to be flip for a moment: Me getting all excited about a particular topic, ranting about it continuously for a few months/years until I get my head around it/find a new obsession (and then intermittently from then on) is in general part of the whole reason I got a blog(*). I'm not sure I see how racism is any worse than fanfiction meta or wire crochet :P

But I do understand that just because you may not write about this stuff on your blog doesn't mean you don't care, the same way that I still cared about it before I started posting about it so much, and will still care if I decide to tone it down. Heck, it's not like I stopped making wire crochet...(EDIT: Also, you're under no obligation to read all my posts. I'll admit now, I skim over anything you guys post resembling a travelogue, my brain just refuses to process them)

The second criticism is something I'm still pondering how to articulate my response to, since it's a complex issue, and I know how that sort of thing can feel (I spent several years too intimidated to go to Gynaecon since I had ambivalent feelings about feminism(**)) I have this big metaphor about how I want to behave the way I would like my vegetarian/vegan friends to behave towards me, but it's going to take a little more thought.

(*) Also with racism (but not so much sexism etc, for various reasons), I've spent much of my life avoiding speaking up a lot of the time because it was all too difficult and I felt underqualified, so I have a lot of repressed annoyance to work through.
(**)No offense to the people who run Gynaecon, btw, since you were all very welcoming when I did come, and I think the problem was mostly if not all in my head.
Wednesday, August 6th, 2008 07:10 am (UTC)
Different people are intimidated in different ways (and vice vera for intimidatingness: I can be quite forceful and overbearing in my own way), it's very subjective. I think expressing an opinion on a contoversial subject is always going to make some people with a different opinion on that issue a bit uncomfortable, the issue is balancing that with the need for self sexpression etc.

Though - I have to say... Gynaecon sounds HORRIBLY intimidating o..0
Sure it isn't, but that's a heck of a name. Ew.


Heh. I can see that, though I don't remember the name really putting me off in and of itself. Names are funny like that, I remember the eternal arguments when I was on the Brights Forum, as people would go on about how they'd join if the name was only changed to something more inviting like *blah*, and then 100 people would respond saying "But that's even more uninviting!" :)