May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829 3031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 03:58 pm
And now I start remathsifying I can't stop myself...


Last two links via [livejournal.com profile] sassamifrass.

(*)And they have a special theorem just for her birthday. She has a lot of maths cred :)
Tags:
Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 12:44 pm (UTC)
Bookshelf: so very pretty.
Clock: -6 o'clock is a perfectly reasonable time. Curse their 7:00 ambiguity.
Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 02:59 pm (UTC)
'Twould have been lovely if they had used the equation* x2 = 36. No need to throw away a root, and no ambiguity.


* Although, please, all equations or all values. Because the back and forth slippageness makes me unhappy.
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 12:51 am (UTC)
-6 o'clock is a perfectly reasonable time

Absolutely! Also did you notice the 9 o'clock thing sanguinity points out? Blegh. I should vet my links more thoroughly.
Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 02:54 pm (UTC)
Bookshelf: yes, so very pretty! And I may actually end up doing something other than throwing my stuff haphazardly up there, which would be phenomenal.

The clock, unfortunately, gives me nails-on-blackboardness. And I'd be so close to loving it, otherwise. :-( But that thing where some representations are values and some are equations? All equations or all values, please, but not this squirrelly shifting back and forth as if the two are the same thing. It makes me uneasy and distrustful and vertiginous. Please stop.

But what makes me tic every time I look at it: their representation for "nine." Is. Not. Nine. Frackin' goddamn sloppy engineers.
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 12:52 am (UTC)
Oh god, I didn't notice the 9. That's terrible.
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 01:43 am (UTC)
Whilst I did notice 9, it was so abhorrent that I immediately blocked it out.
Whilst I fell obliged to defend my profession, the best arguments I could come up with are roughly equivalent to "some engineers are also mathematicians".
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 05:42 am (UTC)
the best arguments I could come up with are roughly equivalent to "some engineers are also mathematicians"

Same :)
Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 12:44 pm (UTC)
Bookshelf: so very pretty.
Clock: -6 o'clock is a perfectly reasonable time. Curse their 7:00 ambiguity.
Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 02:59 pm (UTC)
'Twould have been lovely if they had used the equation* x2 = 36. No need to throw away a root, and no ambiguity.


* Although, please, all equations or all values. Because the back and forth slippageness makes me unhappy.
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 12:51 am (UTC)
-6 o'clock is a perfectly reasonable time

Absolutely! Also did you notice the 9 o'clock thing sanguinity points out? Blegh. I should vet my links more thoroughly.
Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 02:54 pm (UTC)
Bookshelf: yes, so very pretty! And I may actually end up doing something other than throwing my stuff haphazardly up there, which would be phenomenal.

The clock, unfortunately, gives me nails-on-blackboardness. And I'd be so close to loving it, otherwise. :-( But that thing where some representations are values and some are equations? All equations or all values, please, but not this squirrelly shifting back and forth as if the two are the same thing. It makes me uneasy and distrustful and vertiginous. Please stop.

But what makes me tic every time I look at it: their representation for "nine." Is. Not. Nine. Frackin' goddamn sloppy engineers.
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 12:52 am (UTC)
Oh god, I didn't notice the 9. That's terrible.
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 01:43 am (UTC)
Whilst I did notice 9, it was so abhorrent that I immediately blocked it out.
Whilst I fell obliged to defend my profession, the best arguments I could come up with are roughly equivalent to "some engineers are also mathematicians".
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 05:42 am (UTC)
the best arguments I could come up with are roughly equivalent to "some engineers are also mathematicians"

Same :)