The thought hasn't had time to coalesce yet, but this unfunnybusiness post about Snape fans denying the "blood purity=racism" metaphor got me thinking about how in some ways being a muggle is like a disability, and so muggle-borns are the able-bodied children of disabled parents. Like...hearing children of Deaf parents who grew up in Deaf culture (of course some Deaf people would argue that it's not a disability, just a different way of being, but I'd say that's just as true of being a muggle, whatever the wizards think on the subject) Plus of course there's the squibs.
On the whole I think anti-muggle prejudice functions more like racism, but it's interesting to ponder.
On the whole I think anti-muggle prejudice functions more like racism, but it's interesting to ponder.
Tags:
no subject
I may see if I can scrounge up links this weekend.
My thots: there are similarities to both; JKR was obviously modeling the "blood purity" thing on racism, but it doesn't quite parallel--humans of different "races" have the same basic abilities; wizards and Muggles don't. However, JKR's writing is so loaded with kyriarchal assumptions (het-priv, cis-priv, white-priv, male-priv, etc.) that it's fairly pointless to pull out one aspect of discrimination and hash through it in detail, except as an attempt to understand minutia of the Potterverse in order to write fic about it.
Connecting the Potterverse !fails to the real world kinda falls apart, because the Potterverse is not a reflection of the real world; it's a reflection of JKR's take on the real world, with a lot of handwaving over the parts she didn't care to think about. Whether anti-Muggle and anti-Muggleborn prejudice are "really" more like racism or ableism is irrelevant; JKR is not a good enough worldbuilder to make either claim provable.
no subject