May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829 3031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Friday, August 13th, 2010 07:08 am
If you like watching slashy pretty men being jerks and are fine with the erasure, dismissal, objectification and mistreatment of anyone who isn't white, straight, male, upper middle class, English, and able bodied, then this is the show for you. Well, episodes 1 and 3 are, episode 2 is just bad all round (and amazingly racist).

I...found parts of it interesting and engaging, and the slashiness is of a particular type I quite enjoy, but on the whole it wasn't as clever as I would have liked and large sections made me very annoyed. Meta: Neoliberal Holmes, or, Everything I Know About Modern Life I Learned from Sherlock gives a very damning critique, but to follow up on the portrayal of Watson's disability in particular: it is NEVER MENTIONED AGAIN. At all. Not even vaguely alluded to.

And "That's the way it was dealt with in the books" doesn't make it ok, that just means it's not inaccurate as well as ableist. If they were doing a totally 100% literal adaptation which followed every minute detail exactly as it happened in the books I might forgive them and blame Arthur Conan Doyle, but they weren't by a long shot. They chose to keep that particular flaw of the books and must bear the responsibility for that choice.
Thursday, August 12th, 2010 11:48 pm (UTC)
thanks for that link!
Friday, August 13th, 2010 01:18 am (UTC)
i must have missed it on his post. i'm glad you shared it, too!
Friday, August 13th, 2010 01:15 am (UTC)
I read that link yesterday, and it explained my creeping unease (after the first episode, I didn't watch the rest) so perfectly.
Friday, August 13th, 2010 01:33 am (UTC)
p.s. i haven't seen #3, but i really want the coroner/morgue girl to be moriarty.
Friday, August 13th, 2010 02:06 am (UTC)
yes, i thought that was wishful thinking. oh well, i'll watch the third ep soonish.
Friday, August 13th, 2010 07:09 am (UTC)
Thanks for the link. Some points I agree with, like the one you bring up here; some are worrying. (Not about the show, but about the viewers' mindset. It reminds me of that creeping didacticism in What Fandom Wants: "Oh noes, the shitty protagonist gets away with being shitty! The writer had to be more explicit on how this was bad!" What are we, three years old?)
Friday, August 13th, 2010 07:59 am (UTC)
Heh, and this is why I don't get excited about new things. And why I feel isolated from fandom.

I like the way you mentioned the lack of cleverness and originality - if anything else, that was appalling. Holmes is a fandom that is not meant to be easy thinking!

I don't even get the big 'slashy' deal -- the producers are affirming that they are both straight. So, yet another fandom where homoerotic subtext has been declared null and void by producers very quick to reaffirm the heteronormative 'ideal'.
Edited 2010-08-13 08:01 am (UTC)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
hl: Drawing of Ada Lovelace as a young child, reading a Calculus book (Default)
[personal profile] hl
Friday, August 13th, 2010 09:09 am (UTC)
Fuck, some of those phrases. O_O

That's a powerful post, thanks for linking it.
Friday, August 13th, 2010 12:59 pm (UTC)
not really surprised at the amazingly racist =/ and yeah, that post kinda gets you where it hurts.

(will probably still love it)

If they were doing a totally 100% literal adaptation which followed every minute detail exactly as it happened in the books I might forgive them and blame Arthur Conan Doyle, but they weren't by a long shot. They chose to keep that particular flaw of the books and must bear the responsibility for that choice.
nodnodnodnodnodnod