If you like watching slashy pretty men being jerks and are fine with the erasure, dismissal, objectification and mistreatment of anyone who isn't white, straight, male, upper middle class, English, and able bodied, then this is the show for you. Well, episodes 1 and 3 are, episode 2 is just bad all round (and amazingly racist).
I...found parts of it interesting and engaging, and the slashiness is of a particular type I quite enjoy, but on the whole it wasn't as clever as I would have liked and large sections made me very annoyed. Meta: Neoliberal Holmes, or, Everything I Know About Modern Life I Learned from Sherlock gives a very damning critique, but to follow up on the portrayal of Watson's disability in particular: it is NEVER MENTIONED AGAIN. At all. Not even vaguely alluded to.
And "That's the way it was dealt with in the books" doesn't make it ok, that just means it's not inaccurate as well as ableist. If they were doing a totally 100% literal adaptation which followed every minute detail exactly as it happened in the books I might forgive them and blame Arthur Conan Doyle, but they weren't by a long shot. They chose to keep that particular flaw of the books and must bear the responsibility for that choice.
I...found parts of it interesting and engaging, and the slashiness is of a particular type I quite enjoy, but on the whole it wasn't as clever as I would have liked and large sections made me very annoyed. Meta: Neoliberal Holmes, or, Everything I Know About Modern Life I Learned from Sherlock gives a very damning critique, but to follow up on the portrayal of Watson's disability in particular: it is NEVER MENTIONED AGAIN. At all. Not even vaguely alluded to.
And "That's the way it was dealt with in the books" doesn't make it ok, that just means it's not inaccurate as well as ableist. If they were doing a totally 100% literal adaptation which followed every minute detail exactly as it happened in the books I might forgive them and blame Arthur Conan Doyle, but they weren't by a long shot. They chose to keep that particular flaw of the books and must bear the responsibility for that choice.
Tags:
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I do think that Sherlock's prattishness was not supposed to be entirely sympathetic/"right", but the narrative supported his prejudices and arrogance enough that I find it hard to draw the line.
no subject
I like the way you mentioned the lack of cleverness and originality - if anything else, that was appalling. Holmes is a fandom that is not meant to be easy thinking!
I don't even get the big 'slashy' deal -- the producers are affirming that they are both straight. So, yet another fandom where homoerotic subtext has been declared null and void by producers very quick to reaffirm the heteronormative 'ideal'.
no subject
Can I have a show where they leave the homoerotic subtext in, but don't declare the character's sexuality as something that needs to be on the public record?
Indeed. Or ones where the characters are canonically lgbtq! But that is of course INCONCEIVABLE.
no subject
Fuck, some of those phrases. O_OThat's a powerful post, thanks for linking it.
no subject
(will probably still love it)
If they were doing a totally 100% literal adaptation which followed every minute detail exactly as it happened in the books I might forgive them and blame Arthur Conan Doyle, but they weren't by a long shot. They chose to keep that particular flaw of the books and must bear the responsibility for that choice.
nodnodnodnodnodnod
no subject