I feel like it's a matter of time before I see "Yuri on Ice is the most feminist show ever"

[sqbr]

With arguments including:

• Made by a woman of colour (directed by a Japanese woman in Japan)
  
• Aimed at women, female gaze (don't get me started on 'the female gaze'. Just. Don't)
  
• Does not objectify women (because it's about men)
  
• Multiple well drawn female characters (who are secondary to the men)
  
• Canon amab genderqueer gay asexual protagonist in canon relationship with a man (is about two mildly gender non conforming guys being homoerotic-with-plausible-deniability)
  
• Ethnic diversity (a Thai character has had a few lines)
  
• Title is clearly a queer feminist deconstruction of male gazey yuri anime (title is very confusing if you are looking for actual yuri)
  

Which is to say: it's a lot of fun and less problematic/more progressive than most sports anime. I really like it! But it's still a mainstream anime about dudes.

I haven't actually seen any arguments along these lines for this show in particular but I was replying to a friend's post about the way people twist themselves in knots to argue that stories about dudes are THE MOST FEMINIST EVER and went "What would my example be? Well I just watched an episode of Yuri on Ice, and...oh God. I know exactly what someone out there is saying about this show".

Now later when I see such meta I can say "I KNEW IT" :)

Comments

[moonvoice]

I wonder if it's a need to swing to 'ideological purity' and make sure the show is just 'so overwhelmingly amazing politically' that people can't crucify it into 'just outright terrible 100% trash' in a world of political binaries that are designed to Other people pretty aggressively?

I mean it seems pretty self-evident that Yuri on Ice is not the most feminist show ever, and that it's not actually a *gay* show (despite being fun to imagine and the show being enthusiastic about prodding that along re: fanservice) and it's not actually a show that centralises female characters etc.

But in a world where (I'm thinking Tumblr here mainly) things need to be The Best or The Worst, I wonder if people are already trying to carve a The Best space out for it? I don't know. And yeah, I think it's gonna happen too. Alternatively someone will single it out for something it's doing wrong and suddenly it will become the 'trashbaby' show that everyone feels guilty about enjoying etc. *quietly throws hands in the air*

At the moment the only people who I'm following who are into this show are just posting art, gifs, fanart, memes and stuff. And the occasional ice-skating skill breakdown, lol.

[sqbr]

I wonder if it's a need to swing to 'ideological purity' and make sure the show is just 'so overwhelmingly amazing politically' that people can't crucify it into 'just outright terrible 100% trash' in a world of political binaries that are designed to Other people pretty aggressively?

That and it gives an excuse to decry the shows people don't like as trash by comparison :/

[hebethen]

Maybe it's because I was in Homestuck-land for a large part of my stay in Tumblr (2011 to 2013), but I sort of overhear from the sidelines mentions of this "100% perfect vs 100% terrible" thing and it just seems subtly off to me? I know there's always some fans who will interpret any criticism as "you said it was 100% terrible! hdu h8!", but it felt like the tenor back then, at least where I was reading, was more leaning toward Nothing Is Above Criticism, Deal With It. Can things have changed so quickly? Am I just experiencing ageing-induced subjective timeframe compression?

[sqbr]

Hmm. I feel like things have definitely gotten much worse since 2013, and Homestuck fandom was generally less prone to this sort of thing when I was hanging out there a lot (2010-2012ish, I think). But tends are always very unevenly distributed, all these attitudes have always existed to a greater or lesser extent in different parts of fandom.