Recently there have been a spate of "Reply to this post and I'll tell you 3 things I love about you, then post in your lj" posts, which I haven't replied to since neither part of it appeals to me (consumed as I am with hate and bile. No offense intended to those of you who aren't :)) On the whole I find those "reply to this" posts a bit scary, since there's so much baggage with replying when what I want to say is generally something tangential like "These memes are scary" or a reply to someone else's comment.
Anyway, I came up with an alternative:
Reply to this post (NOT one of the comments, or it'll all get confused) with a question. Then post a separate comment with an answer to the question immediately above yours, as a reply to the comment containing the question.
Everyone is free to answer as many questions as they feel like whether or not they post any. I guess that technically, if you want you can also post extra questions (or whatever) in the comments to other replies, but I probably will refuse to answer them on principle :P
To repeat: Each question is a separate comment to this post, with all the replies to that question being replies to that comment. You are only obliged to reply to the question posted immediately before your own (that way everyone gets at least one answer)(*)
There is no obligation to post this in your own lj(**). There is also no obligation on me to reply to any of the questions, though I probably will.
(First question is in the comments)
(*) If it assumes things that don't apply, ie you're colourblind and it asks what your favourite colour is, make up a similar question and answer that instead :)
(**)Making it a rather evolutionarily unfit meme. Especially because it turns out to be a lot harder for people to grasp than I expected (I've edited three times for clarity already)
Anyway, I came up with an alternative:
Reply to this post (NOT one of the comments, or it'll all get confused) with a question. Then post a separate comment with an answer to the question immediately above yours, as a reply to the comment containing the question.
Everyone is free to answer as many questions as they feel like whether or not they post any. I guess that technically, if you want you can also post extra questions (or whatever) in the comments to other replies, but I probably will refuse to answer them on principle :P
To repeat: Each question is a separate comment to this post, with all the replies to that question being replies to that comment. You are only obliged to reply to the question posted immediately before your own (that way everyone gets at least one answer)(*)
There is no obligation to post this in your own lj(**). There is also no obligation on me to reply to any of the questions, though I probably will.
(First question is in the comments)
(*) If it assumes things that don't apply, ie you're colourblind and it asks what your favourite colour is, make up a similar question and answer that instead :)
(**)Making it a rather evolutionarily unfit meme. Especially because it turns out to be a lot harder for people to grasp than I expected (I've edited three times for clarity already)
Tags:
So....
Re: So....
Would you put up a cheesecake/beefcake calendar at work, and would you object if a colleague did?
Re: So....
What is the scariest horror movie you've ever seen?
Re: So....
Re: So....
no subject
Would you put up a cheesecake/beefcake calendar at work, and would you object if a colleague did?
(No reason.)
Re: So....
Re: So....
Re: So....
Re: So....
I promise to answer your question if you repost it :)
(That said, I think having it as one long thread would be kind of cool, but that's not what I had in mind and dammit it's my meme! *stamps foot*)
no subject
As to whether I'd object, well...I probably wouldn't like it that much, but I think it would depend on circumstances and the nature of the calender. (Also I'm pretty passive, so if they didn't respond to me complaining to them would probably just quietly seethe).
For example, my female Phd supervisor had a firemen calender in her office, and they looked really happy and healthy, and the proceeds all went to charity, so it didn't bug me (I can't speak for her male students :)) I don't think I'd mind a female version of that.
no subject
no subject
But I blame my genes. Being unemotional, annoying, and overly analytical run as deeply in my family as being short, dumpy and brown-haired.
And way to give the next person a hard time answering the question without implicitly insulting me (of course, they may see this as a plus...)
*resists urge to reply with "Why is
no subject
But, I'm not particularly offended, and by and large prefer my Dalek calendar, so it's a non-issue. But it got me thinking. :)
no subject
How would you improve democracy?
Re: So....
Re: So....
no subject
Of course the fact that every question poster so far has done this is perhaps a sign I didn't explain it very well....(Or you're being annoying on purpose. Or both. Or neither. Or all of the above!)
Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ...
I think you explained what we did with great clarity. What you're now talking about, I have absolutely no idea!
no subject
Are you related to Woody Allen by any chance?
*ducks*
Still, it would've mean nice to see you play this meme with a straight bat!
Re: So....
no subject
(Mine is still "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.")
no subject
no subject
no subject