May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829 3031

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010 07:09 am
I'm not entirely comfortable telling LGBTQIA people what "queer" means but I'm pretty sure the definition of "queer" at canonqueer is too narrow.

Anyway, they look like they would benefit from a wider range of opinions regardless (and could be an interesting comm!).
Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010 10:01 am (UTC)
I actually think their original definition wasn't too bad and am disappointed that they now include all trans characters by default. The new definition automatically defines all trans characters as queer regardless of their identity and this, to me, is problematic. A lot of trans people are not queer identified and if they get lumped under the queer umbrella regardless then that erases their agency, identity, and ability to self-define, which happens to trans people far too often already.

I would have happily joined the community (were I into that kind of fandom) under their initial definition of queer, but not under the new definition.
Thursday, June 24th, 2010 02:12 pm (UTC)
Thank you for posting this. I see what you mean, and have posted over there to try and get them to clarify and rephrase.