Thorns

I've been watching Flashforward and quite enjoying it, the slow reveal of plot, timey-wimey stuff(*), and the charcater's reactions to both are pretty good so far. The female characters are pretty well drawn too, even if there's a bit of Bechdel fail.

But it just struck me: afaict every single significant adult female character's vision is about (heterosexual) love/sex, or children. As I recall the only female characters of any significance whose visions were not of this type are deux ex machina one-offs whose vision is vital to a male character's arc.

Since I only just noticed this in episode 3 I may have missed some in the first two episodes.

Also: having just seen the most recent episode of Dollhouse, as much as the show may be dodgy it does occasionally shine with effective gender commentary. It's a heady mix of awesome, fail, and generic B-grade crap.

(*)Everyone in the world blacked out and had a 2 minute vision of six months in the future. So now not only does everyone have to deal with the damage and death from the blackout, but whatever mundane or inspiring or disturbing vision they saw. And things are coming together to make those visions come true, which is not always a good thing...

Reading through the latest Feminist sf carnival I hit some links which made me go "yes! That! Grr!". So I thought I would share the joy :)

Joss Whedon and feminist cookies Makes the point that one can (and should) acknowledge the effort of feminist writers like Joss Whedon..while still calling them on their mistakes. And oh, does he make some mistakes. Also, this comment captures some of the dodginess of the "Women corrupted by power" archetype.

On a similar subject Firefly: The Trouble With Saffron, on the fact that having a sweet innocent female victim of abuse who has pity taken on her turn out to be an evil sexy seductress is, uh, kind of creepy, especially given that it's done so often. I think there's a subtext to the "Turn a victimised group who 'everyone cares about' into the villain" thing which plays on the fact that deep down people don't want to sympathise with victims, and get annoyed at having to care about them, so get a real sense of catharsis from having them turn out to have been evil all along.

It got me thinking about the sheer absurd fetishisation of the "Woman who becomes evil automatically starts dressing an acting more sexily" thing. I'm not saying that women can't use sexuality to gain power, or that being sexy is inherently bad (or good) But it's just one way to be powerful, and it plays both into the "woman + sex=evil" trope and the "Women exist to serve men" trope (since she is titillating the male viewers rather than doing what makes sense for the character) It's way overdone in Supernatural, I'd love to see an evil female character who is genuinely gross (like, a zombie or something(*)) do the whole "creepy touching" thing (in order to deliberately creep the guy out, not in a failed attempt to be sexy), then it would be actually creepy rather than a thinly veiled excuse for men to despise the women they're attracted to. And why can't a woman be aggressively sexy and dressed in leather and not evil? Actually, I guess that was Xena. Yay Xena :) EDIT: Yeah, ok, so there's MANY counterexamples to this :)

EDIT: Oh hey, metafandom :) Man, I really didn't put much thought into this post, and now I have to justify my dodgy arguments with a fuzzy brain...All disclaimers are in operation!

(*)Except I hate zombies. Hmm.

How is that that I find out that Joss Whedon has a new project from a doctor who macro? I rely on you people for this stuff you know!