So, I don't drink, never really got into it, and it's been nearly ten years since I was a teenager.
But while adding a tax to pre mixed drinks may cut down on teens drinking, wouldn't the logical solution just be for them to...mix their own drinks?
If I was a bottleshop owner I'd start selling value packs of fanta and vodka.
EDIT: Cam has pointed out that if any of you were dumb enough to go "Oh well, guess I'll have to stop drinking" I've just set you back on the path to drunkenness and ruin. Eh, I don't think any of you are teenagers anyway :)
EDIT 2: So apparently they're just making the tax more consistent, since it used to be cheaper to buy premixed drinks than the raw ingredients. That makes sense then, but the article is still dumb.
But while adding a tax to pre mixed drinks may cut down on teens drinking, wouldn't the logical solution just be for them to...mix their own drinks?
If I was a bottleshop owner I'd start selling value packs of fanta and vodka.
EDIT: Cam has pointed out that if any of you were dumb enough to go "Oh well, guess I'll have to stop drinking" I've just set you back on the path to drunkenness and ruin. Eh, I don't think any of you are teenagers anyway :)
EDIT 2: So apparently they're just making the tax more consistent, since it used to be cheaper to buy premixed drinks than the raw ingredients. That makes sense then, but the article is still dumb.
Tags:
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I thought the problem with premixes was they are marketed at a younger audience (like softdrink) than bottles of spirits, so they attract young drinkers.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ah well, fewer smirnoff blacks and more rum and diet cokes coming up.. at least when I'm being a cheapskate :)
no subject
won't someone please think of the children
Re: won't someone please think of the children
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject