May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829 3031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, March 10th, 2009 06:28 pm
I love the tone of this article: Chimp planned rock attacks on zoo visitors.

Aww! Look at how ingenious his plots are to kill the zoo visitors! And see the sociopathic calm with which he prepares his weapons! Isn't nature inspiring?

I also like the way chimps disprove all those fluffy ideas about animals being too simple and pure for war and cruelty. I saw a doco once where one chimp cheerfully beckoned a park keeper (with whom he had an established relationship) over while his friends snuck around the other side to bring him down (the keeper outsmarted them, but geeze)

Really it's the same sort of anthropocentrism that leads to people arguing that animals don't have love or real language or whatever: humans being a special kind of nasty is still us being special.
Tags:
Tuesday, March 10th, 2009 10:28 am (UTC)
Really it's the same sort of anthropocentrism that leads to people arguing that animals don't have love or real language or whatever: humans being a special kind of nasty is still us being special.

Hah! Yes, exactly. And anyone who has spent any time working with animals - or even had a pet - knows that some of them can be downright mean.

Like most country people I have a very jaundiced view of animal rights people and all the other stages of fluffy bunny syndrome down, so I am fully aware I am horrendously biased, but I have to say that in my experience people who think either humans or animals are special always seem to have very little knowledge of animals.
Tuesday, March 10th, 2009 10:42 am (UTC)
Hah! Yes, exactly. And anyone who has spent any time working with animals - or even had a pet - knows that some of them can be downright mean.

*looks at my often very mean spirited cat* Heh. Yes :)

But I think thinking of humans as just animals would be just as likely to make you more in favour of animals rights, up to a point: if it's good enough for us, and we're they're same as them, why is it not good enough for them? And the animal rights activists I know (who are on my flist, just so you know :)) don't seem any more prone to that sort of romanticism than anyone else, especially the ones from the country...

In my experience the sorts of people who really go on at length about how much worse humans are than animals aren't actually interested in being nice to animals, they just like putting down humanity.
Tuesday, March 10th, 2009 11:00 am (UTC)
Trust me, I'm not going to get into an argument with animal rights activists, and I'm certainly not going to do it on your space :)

And yeh, I think I'm just going to walk away from this. There's some stuff that it would be interesting to talk about with you but this one is too emotionally charged for me.
Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 05:00 am (UTC)
Thankyou. I reached my limit for "arguments about animal rights that I can't walk away from(*)" some time in the late 90s :/

(*)Though I'd like to make it clear that I have no problem with them if I can walk away :)
Tuesday, March 10th, 2009 11:38 am (UTC)
That's kinda the type of animal welfare I try to go for. Treat them with respect, try to minimise suffering and realise that both of those won't mean they ain't going to little (or big) shits.

*glares at her also rather cranky cat*

I suspect I might be one of the animal rights people from the country you're thinking of, though I do tend not to identify with animal welfare type activities as opposed to animal rights. :P
Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 05:05 am (UTC)
I suspect I might be one of the animal rights people from the country you're thinking of, though I do tend not to identify with animal welfare type activities as opposed to animal rights. :P

Oops, sorry, I do realise animal rights /= animal welfare! I didn't think about what I was writing carefully enough.