[Poll #1372284]
I looked back over my twitter feed today, apart from the replies to other people's tweets I could be adequately modeled by an AI which spit out an equal mix of geek links, tv comments, and health complaints.
I looked back over my twitter feed today, apart from the replies to other people's tweets I could be adequately modeled by an AI which spit out an equal mix of geek links, tv comments, and health complaints.
no subject
If I already follow the twitter feed elsewhere (such as facebook status updates, or twitter itself): irritating.
Otherwise: convenient.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Heh. The chances of me ever being happy with only expressing myself via 140 character blocks are pretty low.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
@somerandom; oh what a shame
"sigh"
@someoneelse: Ha ha
Is not how I want to communicate. If I did I'd have twitter, it's my choice not to have that kind of interaction and I object to having it foisted upon me.
no subject
(Oh, and it's still open if anyone else wants to weigh in)
no subject
no subject
I have found a good use for Twitter, and that is role play. My actual real life posts and friends on it are few and far between.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I figure if people want to follow me on Twitter they'll either get a Twitter account (60 seconds work to set up then actually reading it) or just subscribe to my Twitter RSS feed (10 seconds work max).
That is to say, I can't logically think of a situation where LoudTwitter doesn't simply end up with the people who wanted to follow my Twitter getting duplicates, and the ones who didn't want to follow my Twitter getting it anyway.
That said, if you want to post it to your LJ for personal record-keeping / information flow purposes, rather than doing it 'for the readers' that's another story entirely.
no subject
no subject
I do not, and have no intention of twittering. Not even to follow Steven Fry
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's far less annoying if they've been nicely put behind a cut, which seems to be most of them now.
If I wanted to read twitter comments, I'd have a twitter account...
no subject
no subject
If I already follow the twitter feed elsewhere (such as facebook status updates, or twitter itself): irritating.
Otherwise: convenient.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Heh. The chances of me ever being happy with only expressing myself via 140 character blocks are pretty low.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
@somerandom; oh what a shame
"sigh"
@someoneelse: Ha ha
Is not how I want to communicate. If I did I'd have twitter, it's my choice not to have that kind of interaction and I object to having it foisted upon me.
no subject
(Oh, and it's still open if anyone else wants to weigh in)
no subject
no subject
I have found a good use for Twitter, and that is role play. My actual real life posts and friends on it are few and far between.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I figure if people want to follow me on Twitter they'll either get a Twitter account (60 seconds work to set up then actually reading it) or just subscribe to my Twitter RSS feed (10 seconds work max).
That is to say, I can't logically think of a situation where LoudTwitter doesn't simply end up with the people who wanted to follow my Twitter getting duplicates, and the ones who didn't want to follow my Twitter getting it anyway.
That said, if you want to post it to your LJ for personal record-keeping / information flow purposes, rather than doing it 'for the readers' that's another story entirely.
no subject
no subject
I do not, and have no intention of twittering. Not even to follow Steven Fry
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's far less annoying if they've been nicely put behind a cut, which seems to be most of them now.
If I wanted to read twitter comments, I'd have a twitter account...
no subject