This journal is intended to be a safe space for discussing social justice issues and other difficult subjects (everything else is on my livejournal, though that may change).
While I'm always open to constructive criticism, these rules are ONLY up for discussion on this post, and must be followed as much as possible even while you're disagreeing with them. They are subject to change without notice.
Everyone:
If I'm talking about a social bias you don't suffer from:
If you have something to say which breaks these rules
Consider not saying it :P
But if you must: Send it as a private message or email, or make a post on your own journal and leave a comment with an explanation and link.
If you make a comment which I think deserves a reply but I'm not comfortable making public, I'll leave/make it screened and send you a private message.
Consequences
If you break these rules you will be warned (with more or less politeness depending on how deliberate I think it was) and if necessary banned. If someone else is doing something you think violates the rules or otherwise makes you feel unsafe you are welcome to express your problem with their behaviour to them, and if you feel I should do more about it let me know.
Notes for your benefit
Unfortunately I'm still a bit of a clueless idiot and may break the rules myself from time to time. I will try VERY hard to listen to any criticism on this score.
Also I have chronic fatigue syndrome which flares up at random and means I may be slow to respond to comments and deal with any issues.
Everything before 20th April 2009 is ported over from my lj so is not a safe space, watch yourself in the comments.
Fine print
These terms of service apply and I work from these axioms and think we should listen to the people at the bottom of the pile. If you're still a bit hazy on what sort of space I'm after check out
synecdochic's "comfort the disturbed, disturb the comfortable" is not just a bumper sticker for me.
These rules were adapted from the comment policies of lots of places, most significantly Hoyden About Town.
While I'm always open to constructive criticism, these rules are ONLY up for discussion on this post, and must be followed as much as possible even while you're disagreeing with them. They are subject to change without notice.
Everyone:
- Do not deny other people's personal experiences.
- Society has inequalities of race, gender, sexuality, class, ability, age etc. This is a bad thing, and it is worthwhile trying to counteract it.
- Avoid hurtful behaviour. Most importantly racism/sexism/ablism etc but also wholesale attacks on religious groups etc, flaming, or personal attacks. Assume that whoever would be most hurt by your words is reading them.
- Post in good faith.
- Noone is immune from criticism, including me, but I get the final veto.
- Do not use the Tone Argument: the way people express themselves is up for criticism but doesn't make it ok to discount their message.
If I'm talking about a social bias you don't suffer from:
- Do not think you understand someone else's oppression (what it's like or how to fix it) better than they do no matter how many other oppressions you suffer under.
- No derailing, if you want to go on a tangent make your own post about it.
- Think before you comment, and only do so if you are adding something helpful to the conversation.
- You are sometimes going to be influenced by and complicit with the bias of the society you live in. If someone points this out, even if they seem rude, don't freak out. Take a step back, really listen to what they've said, and look at why it bothers you.
If you have something to say which breaks these rules
Consider not saying it :P
But if you must: Send it as a private message or email, or make a post on your own journal and leave a comment with an explanation and link.
If you make a comment which I think deserves a reply but I'm not comfortable making public, I'll leave/make it screened and send you a private message.
Consequences
If you break these rules you will be warned (with more or less politeness depending on how deliberate I think it was) and if necessary banned. If someone else is doing something you think violates the rules or otherwise makes you feel unsafe you are welcome to express your problem with their behaviour to them, and if you feel I should do more about it let me know.
Notes for your benefit
Unfortunately I'm still a bit of a clueless idiot and may break the rules myself from time to time. I will try VERY hard to listen to any criticism on this score.
Also I have chronic fatigue syndrome which flares up at random and means I may be slow to respond to comments and deal with any issues.
Everything before 20th April 2009 is ported over from my lj so is not a safe space, watch yourself in the comments.
Fine print
These terms of service apply and I work from these axioms and think we should listen to the people at the bottom of the pile. If you're still a bit hazy on what sort of space I'm after check out
These rules were adapted from the comment policies of lots of places, most significantly Hoyden About Town.
no subject
What's your policy when it comes to handling someone (unintentionally or otherwise) making a bit of an arse of themselves and violating your policy? Do you intend this to be a space where other readers can call them on it, or would you prefer for people to step back and leave that for you to manage?
no subject
I definitely wouldn't want anyone relying solely on my ability to pick up this stuff because I am far from infallible, so I think other people should call it out where they see it (or if they're more comfortable message me about it I guess), but I get final say.
D'you think that sounds sensible?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It is f-locked, I'm happy to add you if you like, here is the url:
http://angiereedgarner.livejournal.com/332165.html?thread=3484549#t3484549
And here is what I actually said, to save you the trouble.
My best ideas about humane blogging practice come from other bloggers on livejournal. See for example this entry originally in debunkingwhite now over at dreamwidth:
http://sqbr.dreamwidth.org/227283.html
The links at the bottom are really good.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It is really difficult judging where to draw the line on civility to people showing their asses. And then you can end up inadvertently supporting some other social bias, I say thinking of a very unfortunate argument I saw once between some straight women and a gay man.
no subject
Since primarily I think the very concept of "safe space" on a voluntarily accessed, effectively anonymous website is so insulting and ludicrous that the suggestion thereof devalues any worthy analysis your following rules have.
If nothing else it will start your ban-list off and any further lucky people to be censored in such a fashion you can lump them with "gee you are just like that Thatcher idiot."
no subject
I apologise for insulting you, that was not my intention. Hopefully you will recover soon from any emotional pain I have caused you.
I'm not 100% happy with the "safe space" terminology myself but it seemed the easiest way to get across my intent. It can't totally prevent deliberate trolls, but I think anyone expecting to be "safe" will be aware of that. And 99% of the trouble on my lj was caused by people who (a)I know in person and (b)didn't seem to realise I would think what they said crossed the line of acceptable behaviour.
no subject
I will throw in the icon of mine I suspect is most likely to be deserving of a banning in your eyes just for kicks.
no subject
no subject
no subject