Who wants to be on my access filter?

[sqbr]

I don't actually have any new locked posts worth reading, but comments from people not on my access list get screened and given all the new people since I last asked it's a pain to unscreen them all :)

So: if you're willing to abide by the comment policy and want to be on my access list let me know and I'll add you. Yes, even if I don't know you, am not subscribed to you, you don't give me access, etc, if it's super personal ertc I'll put it under a more specific filter.

Here's all my locked posts to test your access on. No, there isn't very many :)

Comments

[cesy]

I will do my best to abide by it. Though I know I occasionally make mistakes in matters of privilege, I hope I'm open to being corrected.

[sqbr]

I think that's the best anyone can say :)

[ex_pippin880]

being screened is a pita. :(

[sqbr]

I will take that as a request, let me know if you were just sighing at your doom :)

[dingsi]

Who wants to be on my access filter?

*raises hand* ... very much, yes.

I've read your comment policy and think it's very sensible and helpful. I won't claim that I will never make mistakes, though. I'm hoping that others are going to pick up on it then and tell me to put on some pants.

[alchemia]

I would like to be if you would like me to be :-)

[softestbullet]

YYY :)

[sqbr]

But..you already have access! Well, I shall explicitly not remove it, hows that? :)

[sqbr]

Oh yes, everyone makes mistakes (me especially!). I think I need to add something making it clear that I won't suddenly ban people for a bit of a screwup without giving people an out to say "But I TRIED so I am TOTALLY NOT AT FAULT". Hmm.

[sqbr]

Absolutely!

[softestbullet]

...Ohhhh. I see. I thought it was a specific filter for the topic of "access" (like accessibility?).

Well, I shall explicitly not remove it, hows that? :)

Sounds good! :D

[dingsi]

I think it's more like... I don't expect you to ban people for slipups and such. I just want to state that I am aware that I'm not infallible and that I'm open for criticism. Unlike, I dunno, thinking everything will go smoothly always because I'm totally fine kthnx and then flying off the handle when facing corrections.
(Which might be a self-centered thing to do? Hm.)

[sqbr]

But not flying off the handle when facing corrections is one of the rules! :D (But it's good to know anyway)

[sqbr]

Ahhhh. Yeah, "access filer" is a dodgy abuse of terminology, I should have just said access list.

[dingsi]

Yes, it's part of that... I think it's a bit of a reflexive reaction? Wanting to state that one's trying to be good? Uhm.

[sunflowerp]

Yes, please. (Your comment policy is itself an example of what led me to subscribe, so I have no problems with abiding by it.)

Sunflower